Legal Bulletin No. 261
This bulletin was issued on 22 May 2026
Issued 22 May 2026
Welcome to the two hundred and sixty-first edition of the Personal Injury Commission’s Legal Bulletin. Please see here for details about the legal citations used for the Commission’s decisions. The decisions listed below are now available on AustLII and will be available shortly, on Jade and Lexis Nexis. Any legislative updates are provided at the base of the Bulletin.
Court of Appeal Decision
Kewin v AAI Ltd t/as GIO Insurance [2026] NSWCA 86
Administrative law; judicial review; motor vehicle accident; decision under Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW); section 7.20 not to refer a claim for assessment; claimed psychological or psychiatric injury; dispute as to whether claimant suffered a threshold injury; application unaccompanied by evidence of claimed injury; whether obligation to refer dispute to assessment; whether existence of medical dispute a jurisdictional fact; whether procedural rules inconsistent with s 7.20; Held – grant leave to appeal; direct the appellant to file a notice of appeal in the form of the draft notice of appeal at tab 8 of the White Folder within 7 days, and dispense with the requirements as to service; appeal dismissed; appellant to pay the costs of the first respondent as agreed or assessed.
Decision date: 20 May 2026| Before: Leeming JA, Kirk JA, Griffiths AJA
Presidential Member Decision
Zelimir Ostojic t/as Nickol’s Painting Services v Markovic [2026] NSWPICPD 21
Workers compensation; jurisdiction of Commission determined and limited by scope of the dispute, Skates v Hills Industries Ltd [2021] NSWCA 142 applied; distinction between final and
interlocutory decisions; Licul v Corney [1976] HCA 6; 180 CLR 213 applied; Secretary, New South Wales Department of Education v Connolly [2023] NSWPICPD 38, Mosawi v Baron Forge (NSW) Pty
Ltd [2022] NSWPICPD 48, and DGL(Aust) Pty Ltd v Martino [2023] NSWPICPD 30 followed; Coates
Hire Operations Pty Ltd v Geddes [2008] NSWWCCPD 120, and P&O Ports Ltd v Hawkins [2007] NSWWCCPD 87 not followed; test for interlocutory appeal brought pursuant to section 352(3A) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (1998 Act) considered; time limit for interlocutory appeals; section 352(4) of the 1998 Act and rule 133A of the Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021 considered; Bryce v Department of Corrective Services [2009] NSWCA 188, Rockhard Products Pty Ltd v Economidis [2009] NSWWCCPD 159, and Tjiong v Chang [2025] NSWCA 25 applied; the meaning of ‘worker’ in s 4 of the 1998 Act; the proper test for whether a contract is one of employment or of principal and contractor considered; Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1, and ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2 applied; Askew v Donald Noel Spence t/as Don’s Guttering and Roofing Services [2023] NSWPICPD 13 considered; ‘affected by’ in section 352(5) of the 1998 Act considered; Mars Australia Pty Limited v Knight [2025] NSWCA 229, Fisher v Nonconformist Pty Ltd
[2024] NSWCA 32 applied; approach to fact finding by Presidential Member pursuant to section 352 of the 1998 Act; State of New South Wales v Culhana [2025] NSWCA 157 applied; section 352(6) of the 1998 Act regarding ‘fresh evidence or evidence in addition to or in substitution for the evidence received in relation to the decision appealed against’ considered; CHEP Australia Limited v Strickland [2013] NSWCA 351; 12 DDCR 501, BOH v Engineering Solutions and Services Pty Ltd [2025] NSWPICPD 76, Bulghadaryan v State of New South Wales (South Eastern Sydney Local Health District) [2025] NSWPICPD 59, and State of New South Wales v Stockwell [2015] NSWWCCPD 19 applied; the proper approach to be taken regarding evidence of hospital records considered; Davis v Council of the City of Wagga Wagga [2004] NSWCA 34; 4 DDCR 358 applied; clause 2(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to 1998 Act; ‘deemed worker’ considered; Scerri v Cahill (1995) 14 NSWCCR 389, Turner v Stewardson [1962] NSWR 137, UPVC Window Solutions Pty Ltd v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (icare) [2023] NSWPICPD 11 applied; indicators of business activity; On Call Interpreters and Translators Agency Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2011] FCA 366 applied; approach to calculating pre-injury average weekly earnings; former sections 44C, 44D, 44E of Workers Compensation Act 1987 considered; Cheung v Taiyun Oceania Travel Pty Ltd [2022] NSWPIC 549, J & H Timbers Pty Ltd v Nelson [1972] HCA 12; 126 CLR 625, Cage Developments Pty Ltd v Schubert [1981] 2 NSWLR 227, and Cage Developments v Schubert (1983) 151 CLR 584 considered; failure to exercise jurisdiction; Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163, Kirk v Industrial Court of NSW [2010] HCA 1; 239 CLR 531 applied; Held – Pursuant to section 352(3A) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; leave is granted to appeal the interlocutory decision of Member McGrowdie given on 6 August 2024; pursuant to section 352(4)(b) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 and sections 42, 43 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020; leave is granted to extend the time in which to bring the appeal against the interlocutory decision of Member McGrowdie given on 6 August 2024; the appellant’s application to admit additional evidence pursuant to section 352(6) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 and Procedural Direction WC3 is declined; pursuant to section 352(6A) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; finding in the Certificate of Determination issued by Member McGrowdie given on 6 August 2024 is revoked and a new decision is made, as follows; findings at the time of injury on 8 April 2019; the first respondent was a ‘worker’ within the meaning of section 4 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; pursuant to a contract of casual employment with the appellant.”; pursuant to section 352(3A) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; leave is granted to appeal the interlocutory decision of Member Halstead given on 16 June 2025; pursuant to section 352(6A) of the 1998 Act; paragraph 2 of the Certificate of Determination issued by Member Halstead on 16 June 2025 regarding the issue of PIAWE is revoked; pursuant to section 352(7) of the 1998 Act; the matter is remitted to Member Halstead to determine in accordance with this decision.
Decision date: 8 May 2026 | Before: Deputy President The Hon. Adam Searle
Motor Accidents non-Presidential Member Decisions
CFD v AAI Limited t/as AAMI [2026] NSWPIC 262
Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017; claimant involved in an accident on 29 July 2022 when riding an e-bike in a park; circumstances of accident unclear but likely to have involved a person throwing a rock at the claimant or jumping into her direction of travel and pushing her off the bike resulting in claimant crashing into a pole and suffering injuries; insurer denied liability; issues for consideration about whether the e-bike was a motor vehicle and whether the circumstances of the accident were such that the motor accident had occurred; claimant moved for the claim to be exempted from hearing in the Personal Injury Commission (Commission); complex matters in dispute and any decision likely not to be accepted by the unsuccessful party resulting in rehearing in the District Court; recommendation made by Member to exempt the claim from hearing in the Commission; Held – claim exempted; recommendation subsequently approved by the Division Head, as the President’s delegate.
Decision date: 8 April 2026| Member: Alexander Bolton
Sammon v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2026] NSWPIC 243
Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017; miscellaneous claims assessment; whether claimant wholly or mostly at fault; sections 3.11 and 3.28; claimant sustained injury on 31 March 2022 as a pedestrian crossing Weymss Lane, Surry Hills when he collided with a police vehicle; AAI Limited t/as GIO v Evic, and Podrebersek v Australian Iron and Steel applied; Held – claimant failed to keep a proper lookout; insured driver failed to keep proper lookout; contributory negligence of claimant assessed at 50%; claimant not wholly or mostly at fault for the accident.
Decision date: 1 May 2026| Senior Member: Susan McTegg
Workers Compensation non-Presidential Member Decisions
Mathews v State of New South Wales (Hunter New England Local Health District) [2026] NSWPIC 237
Workers Compensation Act 1987; claim for injury to right hip; claim for weekly benefits compensation and payment of expenses pursuant to section 60 in relation to revision right total hip replacement surgery; consideration of applicant’s statements, medical reports and other treatment records, as well as claim correspondence; whether the applicant sustained an injury to her right hip on 6 January 2025 in accordance with sections 4 and 9A; whether the applicant sustained a consequential infection in her right hip, resulting from any injury sustained by her on 6 January 2025; whether the applicant is entitled to an award pursuant to section 60, specifically in relation to the costs of and incidental to the revision right total hip replacement surgery; whether the applicant is entitled to a weekly benefits compensation award; Galluzzo v Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Trustees of the Society of St Vincent de Paul (NSW) v Maxwell James Kear as administrator of the estate of Anthony John Kear, Kooragang Cement Pty Ltd v Bates, Kumar v Royal Comfort Bedding Pty Limited, Moon v Conmah Pty Limited, and Murphy v Allity Management Services Pty Limited considered; Held – applicant sustained an injury to her right hip on 6 January 2025; applicant sustained a consequential infection in her right hip, resulting from the injury sustained by her on 6 January 2025; treatment expenses incurred by the applicant to treat her infection and to undergo revision right total hip replacement surgery, are reasonably necessary expenses in accordance with section 60; applicant has no current work capacity, resulting from the injury sustained by her on 6 January 2025; awards in favour of the applicant.
Decision date: 11 May 2026| Member: Gaius Whiffin
Singh v CDC Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPIC 255
Workers Compensation Act 1987; claim for workers compensation benefits from alleged neck injury in the course of employment on 30 August 2023 along with surgical expenses; respondent denied liability on the basis of sections 4, 9A, 4(b)(ii); respondent alleged condition pre-existing and not aggravated by workplace events or alternatively aggravation had ceased; Rail Services Australia v Dimovski, Kooragang Cement Pty Ltd v Bates, Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes, AV v AW, Murphy v Allity Management Services Pty Ltd, Rose v Health Commission, and Diab v NRMA Ltd considered; Held – applicant sustained personal injury and aggravation of a disease in the same injurious event; applicant sustained an injury to his neck on the balance of probabilities and on a commonsense assessment; determined injury was the material cause for the need for proposed surgery and surgery is reasonably necessary.
Decision date: 5 May 2026| Member: Diana Benk
Burson v Community Transport Central Coast Limited [2026] NSWPIC 256
Workers Compensation Act 1987; section 4 of schedule 3; injury; consequential condition; Kooragang Cement Pty Ltd v Bates, Briginshaw v Briginshaw, Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Parramatta v Brennan, Moon v Conmah Pty Limited, and Watson’s Culcairn Hotel Pty Ltd v Dwyer considered and applied; Held – award for the respondent in respect to alleged injury to the lumbar spine on 14 December 2021; award for the respondent in respect to alleged consequential condition of the lumbar spine as a result of the accepted left hip injury sustained on 14 December 2021.
Decision date: 6 May 2026| Member: John Turner
Martinez v Pepe's Ducks Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPIC 257
Workers Compensation Act 1987; claim for lump sum compensation; section 66; undisputed workplace injury of left shoulder and cervical spine; whether disease injury of right shoulder in the course of employment; whether right shoulder condition consequential due to “overuse” given left shoulder restriction; worker’s evidence is that all injuries developed concurrently; no contemporaneous medical evidence of right shoulder symptoms; Held – right shoulder condition not a consequence of left shoulder condition where both developed concurrently; insufficient evidence to support disease injury to right shoulder; referral to medical assessor for assessment of whole person impairment on left shoulder and cervical spine.
Decision date: 6 May 2026| Member: Adam Halstead
Shi v Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPIC 258
Workers Compensation Act 1987; whether applicant sustained primary psychological injury in addition to secondary psychological injury; entitlement to lump sum compensation; Cannon v The Healthy Snack Food Pty Ltd, State of New South Wales (NSW Department of Education) v Kaur, Heydeman v Ability Options, and Islam v Eureka Operations Pty Ltd t/as Coles Express considered and applied; Held – applicant sustained primary psychological injury.
Decision date: 7 May 2026| Member: Mitchell Strachan
Main v Muroof 6 Pty Limited [2026] NSWPIC 259
Workers Compensation Act 1987; application for costs for proposed lumbar fusion surgery; accepted injury; injury to lumbar spine and proposed surgery as a result of injury not in issue; only issue whether proposed surgery reasonably necessary; principles in Diab v NRMA Ltd applied and discussed; determination of issue fact sensitive; proposed surgery proposed to alleviate discogenic pain; treatment supported by treating neurosurgeon and qualified opinion; applicant’s qualified doctor equivocal as to alleviation of pain; concept of intuitive reasoning; Murray v Shillingsworth applied; Held – respondent ordered to pay costs of and associated with proposed surgery pursuant to s 60(5) of the Act.
Decision date: 11 May 2026| Principal Member: John Harris
Placewell Group Pty Ltd v Employers Mutual NSW Limited & Anor [2026] NSWPIC 260
Workers Compensation Act 1987 (1987 Act); Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (1998 Act); proceedings brought by employer against insurer seeking a determination that the relevant employment was connected to NSW for the purposes of section 9AA of the 1987 Act; where injured worker made a claim for workers compensation under the Western Australian statutory scheme; standing to commence proceedings; whether the Personal Injury Commission (Commission) has power to make the determination sought; Transport Contract Services (NSW) Pty Ltd v Employers Mutual NSW Ltd, Ultimate Disability Services Pty Ltd v Employers Mutual NSW Ltd & Anor, ASF Australia Pty Ltd v iCare Workers Insurance, Raniere Nominees Pty Limited trading as Horizon Motor Lodge v Daley and Anor, and Widdup v Hamilton; Held – there was no evidence that the worker had make a claim for compensation under the NSW workers compensation legislation; as the proceedings did not concern a dispute about a claim for compensation, the applicant did not have standing to refer the dispute under sections 287(1) and 288 of the 1998 Act; no general power to grant declaratory relief; the Commission has no power to make the determination sought.
Decision date: 11 May 2026| Senior Member: Rachel Homan
Dziekanksi v State of New South Wales (Western Sydney Local Health District) [2026] NSWPIC 261
Workers Compensation Act 1987; industrial hearing loss; whether employer of the nature to which the injury was due; Callaby v State Transit Authority, and Dawson and others t/as The Real Cane Syndicate v Dawson applied and considered; Held – applicant’s employment with the respondent had the tendency, incidents or characteristics to give rise to real risk of injury.
Decision date: 11 May 2026| Member: Mitchell Strachan
Motor Accidents Medical Review Panel Decision
Pi v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2026] NSWPICMP 306
Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017; threshold Injury dispute; claimant halted her vehicle at the intersection of Kerr Parade at Auburn Road, intending to turn right, when the insured jeep collided with the rear of the claimant’s vehicle, pushing it forward; claimant was able to drive into a side street; claimant felt she had sustained a low back injury; claimant first attended her nominated treating doctor some months after the accident; Medical Assessor (MA) found threshold injuries to neck, both hips and lumbar spine caused by the motor accident; no injury to either shoulder or right leg; claimant’s review application allowed on the basis of MA’s failure to provide adequate reasoning and/or explanation for his finding that the lumbar spine is a threshold injury, with specific reference to the MRI evidence of an annular fissure; claimant re-examined by MA on behalf of the Review Panel; Review Panel found lumbar spine soft tissue injury caused by accident is a threshold injury; musculoskeletal neck injury, both hips (nerve injury) and right leg shooting pain all not caused; Review Panel found no evidence of radiculopathy nor nerve root injury; Review Panel noted late onset and reporting of lumbar symptoms; Review Panel noted relatively little structural damage caused to the claimant’s vehicle; Held – certificate revoked.
Decision date: 5 May 2026| Panel Members: Member Gary Victor Patterson, Dr Mohammed Assem, and Dr Shane Moloney| Injury module: Spine, Upper Limb and Lower Limb
Workers Compensation Medical Appeal Panel Decisions
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; appellant sought to admit fresh evidence being a further statement from him principally complaining about the manner in which the Medical Assessor (MA) conducted the assessment; appellant also submits that the MA erred with respect his whole person impairment assessments of all six of the categories of the psychiatric impairment rating scale; Appeal Panel rejected the fresh evidence; found no errors in the Medical Assessment Certificate (MAC); Held – MAC confirmed.
Decision date: 20 March 2026| Panel Members: Member Deborah Moore, Dr Douglas Andrews, and Dr John Lam Po Tang| Injury module: Psychiatric/psychological
Zhou v CGA Trading Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPICMP 301
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; de Quervain’s tenosynovitis of the left wrist; method/s of assessment; assessment based on range of motion; assessment of loss of radial deviation; consideration of contrary medical opinions; reasons; application of strength evaluation as a method of assessment; Held – Medical Assessor erred in drawing an assumption without adequate reasons; error in failing to adequately consider competing medical opinions; appellant re-examined; Medical Assessment Certificate (MAC) revoked; new MAC issued.
Decision date: 1 May 2026| Panel Members: Member Kathryn Camp, Dr James Bodel, and Dr David Gorman| Injury module: Left Upper Extremity
Arch-Systems Fabrication Pty Ltd v McCann [2026] NSWPICMP 320
Workers Compensation Act 1987; appellant suffered lumbar spine injury assessed at 6% whole person impairment (WPI) including an allowance of 2% for the effects on the activities of daily living; appellant suffered weight gain and developed obstructive sleep apnoea as well as insomnolence from ongoing pain; claim referred for assessment under the respiratory system for obstructive sleep apnoea; discussion of American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th ed (AMA 5) and SIRA NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th ed (Guidelines) regarding assessment of sleep disorders under the respiratory chapter for obstructive sleep apnoea and/or due to neurological injury; discussion of meaning of primary sleep disorder following neurological injury under clause 5.10 of the Guidelines; Failure by Medical Assessor to properly explain Class 2 impairment by reference to Tables 1-2 and 13-4 of AMA 5; appellant re-examined for the purposes of determining the effects on the activities of daily living; discussion of concurrent causes of sleep disruption from obstructive sleep apnoea and insomnia; material contribution test applicable: Secretary, Department of Education v Johnson applied; effects on ADLs from back condition not assessable; effects on ADLS from overall sleep disruption assessable provided obstructive sleep apnoea materially contributes to the effects; respondent assessed as Class 2 under Table 13-4; assessment within range evaluative judgment informed by clinical impression; Vannini v Worldwide Demolitions Pty Ltd applied; assessment of 12% for obstructive sleep apnoea confirmed; Held – error established but Medical Assessment Certificate otherwise confirmed.
Decision date: 6 May 2026| Panel Members: Principal Member John Harris, Dr Christopher Grainge, and Dr Peter Honeyman | Injury module: Lumbar Spine, and Respiratory System
Siddiqua v Universal HR Services Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPICMP 312
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; psychological injury; lump sum claim; appellant worker challenged assessment in one of the six psychiatric impairment rating scale categories; concentration, persistence and pace; error found; re-examination considered necessary in the circumstances of a finding of error; Held – Medical Assessment Certificate confirmed.
Decision date: 6 May 2026| Panel Members: Member Jane Peacock, Dr John Lam-Po-Tang, and Dr Michael Hong| Injury module: Psychiatric/psychological
Harris v Kase Building Group Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPICMP 313
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; psychological Injury; lump sum claim; appellant worker challenged assessment in three of the six psychiatric impairment rating scale categories; self-care and personal hygiene, travel and concentration, persistence and pace; error found; re-examination considered necessary in the circumstances of a finding of error; Held – Medical Assessment Certificate revoked.
Decision date: 6 May 2026| Panel Members: Member Jane Peacock, Dr John Lam-Po-Tang, and Dr Michael Hong| Injury module: Psychiatric/psychological
Corrective Services NSW v Harrington [2026] NSWPICMP 315
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; medical appeal panel; section 327(3); demonstrable error; incorrect criteria; self-care and personal hygiene; Jenkins v Ambulance Service of New South Wales, Ferguson v State of New South Wales, and Tregeagle v Mowbray Farm t/as ACMII Australia 2 Pty Ltd considered and applied; Held – Medical Assessment Certificate revoked.
Decision date: 6 May 2026| Panel Members: Member John Turner, Dr Michael Hong, and Dr Graham Blom| Injury module: Psychiatric/psychological
Singh v Energy Efficient Australia Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPICMP 316
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; medical appeal; appeal made on the basis of deduction pursuant to section 323; Appeal Panel identified error in “starting point” of assessment; Coca-Cola Europacific Partners API Pty Ltd v Pombinho, Elcheikh v Diamond Formwork (NSW) Pty Ltd (in Liq), and Vitaz v Westform (NSW) Pty Ltd applied; Medical Assessor combined assessment of loss of extension with varus deformity, inconsistent with clause 3.16 of the SIRA NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th ed; application of section 323; Held – Medical Assessment Certificate revoked.
Decision date: 7 May 2026| Panel Members: Member Parnel McAdam, Dr Roger Pillemer, and Dr Tommasino Mastroianni| Injury module: Left Lower Extremity, and Right Lower Extremity
Mohan v Sydney Blinds & Screen Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPICMP 317
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; psychological Injury; lump sum claim; appellant worker challenged assessment in two of the six psychiatric impairment rating scale categories; concentration, persistence and pace and employability; error found; re-examination considered necessary in the circumstances of a finding of error; Held – Medical Assessment Certificate revoked.
Decision date: 8 May 2026 | Panel Members: Member Jane Peacock, Dr Graham Blom, and Dr Michael Hong| Injury module: Psychiatric/psychological
Sherwin-Williams t/as Valspar Automotive Australia Pty Limited v Ahearn [2026] NSWPICMP 318
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; Medical Assessor erred in his whole person impairment assessment of one of the categories of the psychiatric impairment rating scale, namely social and recreational activities; Appeal Panel agreed; evidence supported a Class 2 rating, not a Class 3; Held – Medical Assessment Certificate revoked.
Decision date: 11 May 2026| Panel Members: Member Deborah Moore, Professor Nicholas Glozier, and Dr John Baker| Injury module: Psychiatric/psychological
Hakainsson v Warringah Tree Services Pty Ltd [2026] NSWPICMP 319
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; appeal from finding of 7% for shoulder injury; whether uninjured contralateral shoulder had full range of motion; whether reasons adequate for diagnosis; whether injury occult; Held – shoulder injury caused by trauma therefore injury not occult pursuant to Table 16-23 of American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment,5th ed; Medical Assessor (MA) erroneously assumed stability testing not performed by claimant’s specialist; re-examination performed by panel member who found contralateral shoulder to have full range of motion, contrary to finding by MA, nerve damage (not claimed) also found; Medical Assessment Certificate revoked.
Decision date: 12 May 2026| Panel Members: Member John Wynyard, Dr Alan Home, and Dr Roger Pillemer| Injury module: Left Upper Extremity
Greco v Pasta Express 2820 [2026] NSWPICMP 321
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; Medical Appeal Panel; section 327(3); demonstrable error, incorrect criteria, travel, employability, path of reasoning; Jenkins v Ambulance Service of New South Wales, Ferguson v State of New South Wales, and Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak considered and applied; Held – Medical Assessment Certificate revoked.
Decision date: 12 May 2026| Panel Members: Member John Turner, Dr Michael Hong, and Dr Graham Blom| Injury module: Psychiatric/psychological
This publication is for information only. The publication is not legal advice. The information provided is not a substitute for reading the decisions. The Commission does not accept liability for the information in this publication or for way the information is used.
Subscribeto receive legal bulletins to your inbox.